Sunday, July 30, 2006

Professional learning vs professional development.

It seems that professional development is a thing of the past for teaching and professional learning is the what should be happening now. It was a few months ago that I was pulled up for referring to 'professional development', and have been mulling this over and reading ever since. I feel that maybe the sun is rising above the fog.

I understand that this change, specifically within teaching, is part of the change in reclaiming (or claiming) of teaching as a profession. The push in the context of a move from a percieved technocratic view of teaching, where teachers are 'trained' in the 'art and craft' of teaching, towards a learned and research based profession. The term 'professional development', in this context perhaps reflects the model where outside influences will 'develop' the teacher's skills, through delivering short courses. This compares to a 'professional learning' model where the teacher is at the core of the learning, learning may not be based on preset outcomes, but it is ongoing, involve collaboration and be long term.

Although governing bodies in New Zealand and England are moving towards using the term 'professional learning', there appears to be a flip flopping between the two terms.

1 comment:

DRS said...

Here in Canada, we are also moving to this term. For me, the idea of focusing on learning is a right. The concept of a community of learners can be used to describe our schools. Professional Learning would be reserved for learning taking place without schools.

Perhaps very obvious but an important distinction and shift in perception.

Dean Shareski
http://ideasandthoughts.org